fbpx
Attorney Ethical Standards Hackers

This is a guest post by Matthew Brotmann, Esq., founder of B4 Strategic Solutions.

The reason most people choose to retain the services of a private investigator is to gain access to information they would not otherwise have access to.  After all, that’s what they’re there for.

Right?

But what happens when the private investigator gains access to information he or she should not have or uses methods to gain access that are questionable or downright unethical?

This is an issue, which has particular significance to attorneys or those bound by ethical constraints as part of their professional practice.  Recent headlines have drawn attention to this matter and it is worth further consideration.

Quite often the use of a private investigator makes sense from a strategic and financial perspective.  The private investigators expertise means they may be able to dig up relevant information efficiently and a cost effective manner.  Particularly when the alternative is to have highly paid associate attorney attempt to gather that same information through a series of Lexis and Google searches.  Even worse, you have to spend doing the research yourself.  Thus, the private investigator.  But, unlike you or your young associate, the private investigator may not be subject to the same ethical considerations as you.

Crack-Down on “Hackers-for-Hire”

Recently, federal prosecutors have been cracking down on private investigators who have been functioning as “hackers-for-hire.”  In other words, the investigators have been retained by law firms to gather information for a pending case and have gone beyond the ethical limits of where an attorney himself or herself could go.

In one case, federal prosecutors have charged two private investigators in the San Francisco area with hacking into email and Skype accounts in order to obtain information for pending matters.  Whether or not the attorney knew that they would use this “backdoor” has yet to be established but either way, it doesn’t look good and any perhaps more importantly, evidence gained in this manner may be inadmissible.

Whether it be “pretexting”, in other words, pretending to be someone you are not to obtain private details, hacking or any other method that would not be permissible for an attorney, the attorney retaining that private investigator can be held responsible for this conduct and pay the price.  It’s not OK to turn a blind-eye without delving into how the information is gathered. And, it’s not OK for a lawyer to hire a private investigator to skirt the law in a way that gives them plausible deniability of any potentially illegal or unethical activity.

More often than not, using the “front door” to gain the information can be just as productive, particularly when the person walking through that door is an experienced private investigator.  In addition, information gained in this way does not run the same risk of exclusion at trial.

Ultimately, it is up to private investigator and the attorney (or anyone retaining a private investigator) to discuss ethical constraints and expectations.  These conversations should be memorialized in writing so that there is no misunderstanding down the road.

Enjoyed What You Read?

Sign up for our newsletter and stay up to date with what Hal Humphreys, from Pursuit Magazine, believes to be one of the absolute best blogs in the investigative industry!

3 replies
  1. Shawn Schooley
    Shawn Schooley says:

    My main concern for the field of private investigations is ethics.

    I have taught ethics at the university level for about nine years and one of the reasons I started a PI firm was because of all the unethical PIs I knew who were proud of themselves because of it.

    I agree with the points raised in the post. I would add that PIs may want to consider adding an ethics statement to their websites and offering a contract for their clients that includes reference to said ethics statement.

  2. Edward Pollick
    Edward Pollick says:

    An excellent article. No matter how just your cause may be, it is never worth breaking laws or using unethical behavior to obtain something that would simply be more difficult to obtain otherwise. There is nothing like the feeling of confidence that comes from putting together a case that is beyond reproach.

  3. David Childe
    David Childe says:

    Well put, Attorney Brotmann.

    I consider myself fully subject to all ethical and legal strictures that my attorney-client falls under. I am hired as an independent contractor who acts as his agent. I made a business decision to forgo the retail private investigation market and only work for high-quality attorneys. This offers me many advantages and vistas to pursue as an investigator. Yet it means that I have to know their ethics rules as they pertain to my efforts as well or better than they do. I do that with gusto and, consequently, sleep well at night and feel good about the work I do. Brian has been a strong inspiration for me in this regard.

Comments are closed.