fbpx
Private Investigator Glitter

I am not a violent person. Other than a few fistfights with my younger brother, I have been in only one fight in my life. It was in the rear of a rival high school when I was in 10th grade. I got my butt whupped. And he was about half my size.

But every once in a while, I come across something that gets me fired up. The types of people who give private investigators a bad name.

These are the people that I would love to send an envelope of glitter.

If you have actually been around glitter, you know that it’s completely impossible for it not to go everywhere. While it sounds like harmless fun, it’s actually one of the worst creations of mankind and will literally ruin your day. There is even a whole industry of websites who will do this for as little as $7 (and it’s a business expense).

The “I can get medical records, prescription information and the results of their last colonoscopy” private investigator

Just last week I received a spam email from some “investigative” firm that provided a laundry list of information it could obtain for a few hundred bucks. I get these emails all the time. First off, 100% of the time it is total spam. I guess these guys must take a page from the playbook of the Nigerian scammers or Viagra pushers. Quite a business model they are copying.

About 95% of the time, they say they can provide bank account information anywhere in the world for $249.95. Their website is almost always from the 1990s, and they never list any physical address or any people associated with the firm.

But this one was a little different — in addition to the various bank and investment accounts that they could obtain (illegally, or at least shadily, no doubt), they were also promoting the fact that they can provide prescription information and medical records — the same information and records that are protected by federal law, with fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of ten years for each offense.

The fact that anyone would openly promote the fact that they are violating federal law is mind-boggling.

They also advertised a host of other investigative offerings, like credit card activity, salary history and even frequent flyer activity.

Are there ways to get this information? Through a subpoena or consent, absolutely. Anything less would require either (1) stepping into muddy/illegal waters (e.g., calling a credit card company and pretending to be someone else or hacking into someone’s computer) or (2) putting someone in a position that violates the law or company policy (e.g., bribing someone for information that is not publicly available).

The “I can find you any bank accounts in the entire world” private investigator

I talked about this in a previous post. In short, there is no central way to identify bank accounts in the world. Period. If there were, do you think the government would have such a difficult time finding the overseas accounts of convicted fraudsters?

In short, in the United States the Right to Financial Privacy Act prohibits financial institutions from disclosing bank records or account information about individual customers to governmental agencies without (1) the customer’s consent, (2) a court order, (3) a subpoena, (4) a search warrant or (5) other formal demand, with limited exceptions.

The rest of the world is a bit of the Wild West, but in general, unless you have some sort of consent or court order, you cannot obtain information relating to a bank account or the amount in the bank account.

I am not blind to the fact that investigative firms advertise that they do this work all the time. I will tell you that nearly every time, they are either doing something illegal (shady at the very least) or they are putting somebody in an extremely compromising position, most likely by using some sort of bribe or payment, by asking them to give out unauthorized information.

If that is up your alley, be my guest — there are plenty of private investigators who will illegally obtain offshore bank records.

As for me, I would rather keep my private investigator license and my rap sheet clean.

The “I am above the law” private investigator

A while back, I was contacted by a client regarding a situation in Virginia in which a concerned family wanted to place a GPS device in the vehicle of an elderly woman. The woman had Alzheimer’s, and they wanted to keep track of her. It seemed like a totally reasonable request and one that I imagine a lot of families might consider.

I spoke to one local private investigator, who came recommended from another investigator in DC. In part, I wanted to see if he was capable of doing this, but also to see what the applicable laws were in Virginia. He told me he could “put a device on any car, anytime, anywhere.”

I was flabbergasted.

I am no expert in GPS tracking, but it’s widely understood that you can install a GPS tracking device only if you share ownership of the vehicle.

The truth of the matter is that there is no cut-and-dried answer regarding GPS tracking, especially with non-law enforcement individuals. The law has not kept up with technology. But any car, anytime, anywhere? This was about a month or two after the landmark 2012 Supreme Court ruling that warrantless GPS tracking is unconstitutional.

So I asked him about the Supreme Court ruling.

His response: “It said nothing about private investigators. It only had to do with law enforcement. Until there is a specific law that states that private investigators can’t do it, I’m doing it.”

I was shocked. So, the police can’t install a GPS without a warrant to catch a criminal, but a private investigator needs no authorization to install one in the car of a private citizen? And you need a specific law to stop you?

I never used him. And I told the investigator who referred him about my conversation. He’s never used him again either.

The “If I told you where I got the information, I’d have to kill you” private investigator

This is my favorite, and it typically means one of two things: (1) It’s so simple to get the information that it’s embarrassing to say, or (2) the information is obtained through shady/illegal means that might land someone in jail.

Here is my philosophy: If you can’t tell me where the information came from, it is (almost always) no good to me. As Canadian private investigator Richard McEachin so accurately points out:

Secret sources always introduce reliability problems into an investigation … Is the secret source doing something illegal to obtain the information? Is the data fabricated?

Case in point is Joseph Dwyer, a private investigator from Investigative Resource Group, who was bribing a police officer to gain access to the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database and is now facing up to 45 years in prison. I am pretty sure that he couldn’t tell me where he was getting his information.

Lessons Learned

Don’t fall into the fictional world trap of the hard-drinking gumshoe with the dark, smoky office and a ready bottle of Scotch in the drawer, fraught with underworld danger, high-speed chases and the commonplace practice of breaking the law to obtain information.

In the real world, there are real implications fraught with legal and ethical issues.

Photo courtesy of ShipYourEnemiesGlitter.com

Enjoyed What You Read?

Sign up for our newsletter and stay up to date with what Hal Humphreys, from Pursuit Magazine, believes to be one of the absolute best blogs in the investigative industry!

16 replies
  1. Shawn Schooley
    Shawn Schooley says:

    Bravo Brian!

    Though there are some exceptions in certain legislation that give PIs specific access to certain information that is more difficult, if not illegal, for law enforcement to obtain because of Constitutional prohibitions.

    Keep up the good work.

  2. Kris
    Kris says:

    Is it true that Licensed Private Investigators are afforded access to government information on the public that private citizens are not?
    From reading your articles, I’m getting the impression that it isn’t true.
    Somehow I got the impression that a licenses private investigator could get information from police or courts that the rest of us cannot.

  3. Sue Hord
    Sue Hord says:

    Great information Brian. Thank you. But I have a question. How do the car rental companies get away with putting GPS on the car that you rent from them? Is it because they own the car? Do the have to responsibility to let you know that so when you do rent a car that you are knowledgeable about it before hand? And many new high end car manufacturers do put these type of devices on the car before you buy it

  4. Chris
    Chris says:

    Great read, integrity is everything! Speaking of 90s websites these are the some of the folks with all the Sherlock, magnifying glass, binocular, etc. clipart.

  5. John Scandalios
    John Scandalios says:

    Brian: a very good overview of the many implications of the junk mail or junk service provider we see all the time offering us services. It should also be an illumination to those that use these services that they might as well kiss their money or clients money good bye. That being said there are some companies that are totally GLB and other alphabet compliant and provide some of those services. To be totally legal there is no way anyone can give you a balance from a bank account without being in violation of the law.
    The only thing you missed in your description of the “shady” gum-shoe (Mickey Spillane style) was the large breasted blonde secretary.
    Stay safe, John

  6. Adam Lilienfeld
    Adam Lilienfeld says:

    This kind of behavior is not new. For years it was either a legal grey area or never enforced. Once it was cracked down on it went to ground but it’s been years since any arrests made the nightly news. No surprise that another generation of PI’s is at it again.

  7. Lesley McDougall
    Lesley McDougall says:

    What a great way to start the day. Thank you for saying all the things we talk about around our conference room table.

  8. Chris Borba
    Chris Borba says:

    Great article! I think it really puts things into perspective. The GPS story is unbelievable, and slightly scary. It’s those PI’s that give the industry a bad name.

  9. David Childe
    David Childe says:

    It is so important to bring these issues to light and I applaud your efforts. I am relentless about exposing these people on LinkedIn. Some of them dress up nice and are actually looked up to by some of the commenters on the boards. I call them out every single time and will continue doing so. Your stance is of huge benefit in this effort. I have noticed that their activity on the boards is diminished and that they aren’t as blatant when they do post. I would like to see them off entirely, but some things – particularly the most worthwhile ones – tend to take time.

  10. Kevin Cosgrove
    Kevin Cosgrove says:

    Well said Brian…(although you may need some less coffee in your diet)! The bad seeds are always going to be out there until legislation/law enforcement takes more of them off the street. Hopefully this piece educates clients and other investigators to steer clear of “dark side” of the business. Congrats again for stepping out in front of the train for the rest of us.

Comments are closed.